Legal Opinion

Romain v. Earl Schwartz Company

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1989No. 88-567PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

This is an appeal from an action begun to foreclose a mortgage on agricultural real property. Defendant John D. Romain (Romain) appeals from the judgment of the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, Hill County, finding adverse to his cross-claim asserted against Earl Schwartz Company, a partnership (partnership). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Although Romain presents several issues for review, we find that consideration of only two are necessary to decide this case. These issues are:

1) Did the trial court err in determining that Romain as vendor and grantor divested…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spackman v. Ralph M. Parsons Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Hartley v. StiborIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Hayes v. MoffattMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. McCafferty v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 1964
  5. First National Bank of Denver v. AllardColorado Court of Appeals · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sportsman's Warehouse, Inc. v. McGllis/Eckman Investments-Billings, LLC (In Re Sportsman's Warehouse, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2011
  2. Kraft v. HIGH COUNTRY MOTORS, INC.Montana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Summers v. Crestview ApartmentsMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Gierke v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Daugherty v. DaughertyMontana Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API