Legal Opinion

Donald v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 10, 1969No. 42412PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is theft by false pretext, with a prior conviction for an offense of the same nature alleged for enhancement; the punishment, ten years.

His first ground of error is that he was allegedly denied compulsory process of witnesses at his pre-trial hearing. What he actually seemed to want was the records of the banks described in vague language in part as follows:

“And bring with you any ‘Stop Payment' orders issued on said cashier’s check together with your records of whether the payment was successfully stopped or not. And bring with you your records showing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Sonderup v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Angle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Muro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Stephenson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Hurd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Fields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Lundstrom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API