In the Best Interest of E.T.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice.
In this appeal, E.T. contends the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the order authorizing the compelled administration of psychoactive medications and that she was entitled to an evaluation by an independent expert before the hearing. Because the evidence is legally insufficient to support the trial court’s order, we reverse and render.
SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE
A trial court may issue an order authorizing the administration of one or more classes of psychoactive medications if the court finds by clear and convincing…
2Cases cited2 opinions
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re C.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- State ex rel. E.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- In Re CSCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- In Re ET, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
- James Stephen Eason v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.