Legal Opinion

State v. Peterson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1939No. 6681PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

April 24, 1924, respondents gave their note and mortgage for a loan of $4,700 made them by appellant from the permanent educational public school fund of the State. By agreement date of maturity was extended from April 24, 1929, to July 1, 1932. Interest to July 16, 1932, was paid December 16, 1932, thus starting the statute to run as at least of the latter date and the note and mortgage thereafter remained due and unpaid. Foreclosure was commenced December 10, 1938.

Respondent’s demurrer was sustained by the trial court on the ground the cause of action was barred by section 5-216, I. C. A. 1…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. ElySupreme Court of the United States · 1905

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Tracy Tucker v. State of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  3. City of Idaho Falls, an Idaho Mun. Corp. v. H-K Contractors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Engelking v. Investment BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Eberle v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API