Espinoza v. State

Whatever prompted my Brothers upon reconsideration to dismiss this petition, it is *670enough for me that the question presented for review in this cause is not one of substantive law, viz:

“When robbers in two distinct robberies (the instant offense and an extraneous offense) (1) gain entrance into their victim’s homes to commit the robbery, (2) rob their victims of expensive jewelry and money, (3) speak with Spanish accents, (4) wear similar clothing, (5) tie their victims with the neckties of the husband victims and (6) pull the telephones from the wall, are these similarities characteristics…