Legal Opinion
Primo v. City of Bridgeton
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 21, 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
162 N.J. Super. 394 (1978)
392 A.2d 1252
PAULINE E. PRIMO AND ARNOLD PRIMO, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY OF BRIDGETON, BRIDGETON RECREATION COMMISSION AND PUBLIC PARK COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BRIDGETON, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided September 21, 1978.
Mr. Rocco William LoPiano for plaintiffs.
Mr. Charles Gabage for defendants (Messrs. Shapiro, Eisenstat, Capizola, O'Neill & Gabage, attorneys).
MILLER, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
This motion for summary judgment requires the court to construe for the first time N.J.S.A. 5:3-30, a statute originally enacted in 1906 providing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fahey v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Boileau v. De CeccoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Thorp v. LundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Westchester County S.P.C.A. v. MengelNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Bisbing v. Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Keelen v. State, Dept. of Culture, Recreation & TourismSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Watson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Bashioum v. County of WestmorelandCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Weber v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Watson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1981