Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Adams

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 12, 1996No. Nos. 93-3058, 94-3261PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

All parties appeal — including the Government.

A jury convicted Warren Adams, Goldean Adams and Bruce Raybon Jones of conspiring to commit an offense against or to defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371).

The Adamses were also convicted of making false statements to the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) (18 U.S.C. § 1001), misapplying funds belonging to the RTC (18 U.S.C. § 657), impeding the lawful functions of the RTC (18 U.S.C. § 1032(2)), and money laundering (18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) & 1957).

The district court sentenced Warren Adams to 46 months in…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert EckhardtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Daniel Francisco RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Jeffrey Jay RutgardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Donald G. Ford (97-6097/6270) Sandra Hutchins Ford (97-6271)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API