Green v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
It is insisted that the defendant is entitled to the general affirmative charge because the venue was not proven. The omission to make this proof was not called to the attention of the trial court. The court will not be put in error for a failure to give the general charge on this ground. Circuit Court Rule 35.
A question of more serious import arises in a consideration of defendant's plea of former conviction. The evidence discloses that the defendant was in possession of a gallon of whisky, which he had on his person,- and of five bottles of whisky which was found in his house, all on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holland v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Storrs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vogel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- State v. PeaveyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Zimmerman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.