Legal Opinion

United States v. Jones

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided July 13, 1983No. Cr. 83-81PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HAMILTON, District Judge.

Alberda Jones moves to dismiss the indictment 1 charging her with a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(h)(4), receipt of a firearm by a person who has been committed to a mental institution, on the basis that the legislative classification under 18 U.S.C. § 922(h)(4) violates the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment due process clause of the United States Constitution in that it creates an invidious discrimination against all persons who have been “committed to any mental institution” regardless of their present mental status and without any rational basis.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. William Erness Thoresen, United States of America v. Louise Banich ThoresenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Laurence G. WatersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Galioto v. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & FirearmsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
  3. United States v. One (1) Vyatskie Polyany MacHine Building Plant "Molot" VEPR RifleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API