In Re Juan O. Plata, in Re Catalina Plata, Debtors. Peter H. Arkison, Trustee v. Juan O. Plata, Catalina Plata
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentBrunetti, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent.
The majority misapplies In re Nash, 765 F.2d 1410 (9th Cir.1985). Nash involved a dismissal of a Chapter 13 case, not a conversion of a Chapter 13 case to a Chapter 7 case. Although the majority can find “no clear reason” for distinguishing between dismissals and conversions, one is given by Nash itself — the Bankruptcy Code. Nash relied primarily on section 349(b)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code which provides that dismissal of a case “revests the property of the estate in the entity in which such property was vested immediately before the commencement of the case.” 11…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carlos Resendez, Jr., and Marlene Resendez v. Dwight Lindquist, William Westphal and J. J. MickelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- In Re RedickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
- In Re De VosDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
- Ledford v. Burns (In Re Burns)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
- In Re GiambittiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.