Roney v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for capital murder in the course of robbery. *600V.T.C.A., Penal Code See. 19.03(a)(2). The jury having returned affirmative answers to the issues submitted at the punishment stage under Art. 37.071(b), V.A.C.C.P., punishment is death.
In his first ground of error appellant contends it was error to allow a police witness to bolster the identification testimony of Man Thi Tran, the surviving robbery victim present at the murder. He relies on Lyons v. State, 388 S.W.2d 950. The State argues the bolstering testimony was admissible because…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brasfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Jurek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- O'BRYAN v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Hai Hai Vuong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Bridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.