Legal Opinion

State v. Mayo

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 2017No. COA17-340PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Judge.

*298 The Habitual Impaired Driving Act requires the State to allege three prior convictions of impaired driving. Unlike other statutes, the Act does not require the three prior convictions to be from different court dates. We hold, in accordance with our case law and the differences between this Act and other habitual statutes, the State is not required to allege three prior convictions of impaired driving from different court dates.

Glenn Warren Mayo, Jr. ("Defendant") appeals from judgments convicting him of habitual impaired driving and revoking his probation. On appeal, Defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. North Carolina Department of Correction v. North Carolina Medical BoardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. GuffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. State v. TennantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. In Re HickersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re: J.S.G.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  2. In re: J.S.G.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  3. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API