Legal Opinion · Dissent

Zeigler v. Detweiler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 2003Published

1DissentHudock, J.

¶ 1 Because I disagree with the majority’s analysis and conclusion that the jury’s award of medical expenses without compensation for pain and suffering was improper, I respectfully dissent. I believe that the jury’s award is consistent with the evidence presented at trial and in accord with our Supreme Court’s decision in Davis v. Mullen, 565 Pa. 386, 773 A.2d 764 (2001).5

¶ 2 In Davis, Jeffrey Mullen fell asleep behind the wheel of his Ford Tempo and crossed the line dividing the two-way road he was traveling upon, colliding head-on with Jody Davis’ fully loaded tractor-trailer. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. MullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. McDermott v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Closky v. US Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. McDermott v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. McDermott v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API