Legal Opinion

In re Cullinan

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1902Published

1Opinion of the Court

Levextritt, J.:

The respondent did not “ cease to traffic in liquors during the term for which, the tax is paid,” and proceedings to revoke and cancel the' certificate have been instituted within the thirty days required by the statute (Liquor Tax Law, §25.) The facts are undisputed, the respondent does not deny the sales of liquor after the surrender of the certificate. It has been several times held that violations subsequent to the surrender and within the thirty days forfeit the right to the rebate, and that the property right therein does not become complete until all prohibitions have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Miller v. . LymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. In re LivingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. In re MichellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. In re LymanNew York Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API