Legal Opinion

Butler v. McCalip

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1947No. 531PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

When riding as a passenger in defendant's taxicab plaintiff fell out and was injured. She sued for damages and has appealed from a judgment against her.

Included in the record is the deposition of a witness taken by defendant. Defendant has moved to strike the deposition from the record on the ground that it was not used in the trial. Although it was filed prior to trial, the statement of proceedings and evidence does not disclose that it was offered in evidence, in whole or in part, at trial. Plaintiff does not contend that the deposition was offered in evidence but…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ross v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. Richardson v. Portland Trackless Car Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Roberts v. Economy Cabs, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  4. Garrow v. Seattle Taxicab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. McKnight v. Red Cab Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fells v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Fontenot v. Fidelity General Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Yirenkyi v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API