Legal Opinion

In re Mayeux

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 7, 1996No. 96-B-0981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

hPER CURIAM*

Respondent, DONALD L. MAYEUX, was formally charged with failing to provide competent representation; failing to act with due diligence and promptness; failing to keep his client properly informed and misleading his client, in violation of Rules 1.1(a), 1.3,1.4, and 8.4(a)(c) of the Rules of Professional conduct. Respondent failed to properly represent his client in a claim for increased Social Security benefits. Both the hearing committee and disciplinary board recommended that Respondent be suspended with conditions.

Upon review of the record, the disciplinary board’s findings and…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re MayeuxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  2. In re MayeuxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API