Legal Opinion

Earl B. Thompson v. Eric K. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided November 19, 2010No. 09-1026(E)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KASOLD, Chief Judge:

Veteran Earl B. Thompson applies through counsel pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), for an award of attorney fees and expenses. The Secretary argues that compensation under EAJA is not warranted because Mr. Thompson is not a prevailing party and the Secretary’s position was substantially justified. For the reasons set forth below, the application will be denied.

I. BACKGROUND

Mr. Thompson appealed a December 15, 2008, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) that denied his claim for disability compensation for post-traumatic…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Schafrath v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  4. Adway Maggitt, Jr., Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. Espiritu v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Freddie Butts v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2016
  2. Freddie Butts v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2016
  3. Jay D. Conley v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API