State Ex Rel. Crabbe v. Indiana, Columbus & Eastern Traction Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
It is admitted that the franchise ordinance of April 25, 1908, contained the provisions herein set forth with respect to the paving and the local street car service by the respondent nnder the terms of the ordinance. It is also admitted that said ordinance contained the provisions in respect to the forfeiture of the franchise, as herein set forth. It is also admitted that the life of the improvement contemplated under the proceedings of the city council would extend beyond the term of the franchise, which expires on April 25, 1933.
A great deal of evidence was taken by the parties, much of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wabash Railroad v. Adelbert College of Western Reserve UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Havner v. HegnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- People v. New York City Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LaneOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Carleton v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1928