Legal Opinion

In re Perlmutter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 5, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*122OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the First Judicial Department on December 3, 1956 and has been suspended since July 2, 1987 because of a Federal felony conviction for a "serious crime”. (See, Matter of Perlmutter, 141 AD2d 253.)

The crime was evading the Federal currency reporting requirement, and the respondent was sentenced to a term of probation of three years expiring May 8, 1990 (unless shortened or sooner terminated).

It is our stated position that the practice of law shall not be permitted by one on probation for the commission of a…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re PerlmutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. In re LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re PerlmutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. In re PerlmutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API