Legal Opinion

Procyson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 2010PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

Audrey Procyson (Claimant) petitions for review of an adjudication of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) denying her claim for unemployment compensation benefits. In doing so, the Board agreed with the Referee that Claimant was not eligible for benefits under Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law1 (Law) because she *1126voluntarily left her job without a necessitous and compelling reason. In this appeal, we consider whether the Board erred in concluding that Claimant’s sudden departure from work after an upsetting conversation with her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sheets v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Key v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Kyu Son Yi v. State Board of Veterinary MedicineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Fekos Enterprises v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. MetzgerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Wise v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Stugart v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Great Valley Publishing v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. A. Coleman v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. A. Holmes v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API