Legal Opinion

Tops Markets v. S&R Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Prior to the joinder of issue, S&R Company of West Seneca (defendant) moved to dismiss the second amended complaint and plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment. Supreme Court properly treated the motion as one for summary judgment, denied the motion and granted the cross motion. We reject the contention of defendant that it did not receive notice, as required by CPLR 3211 (c), of the court’s intention to treat its motion as a motion for summary judgment. Such notice is not required where, as here, the action involves purely…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Truck Rent-A-Center, Inc. v. Puritan Farms 2nd, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Mihlovan v. GrozavuNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Herlihy v. Metropolitan Museum of ArtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Wein v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Shah v. ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pitts v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Congel v. Tops Markets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Town of Mexico v. County of OswegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API