Legal Opinion

Perret v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided February 1, 1971No. Docket No. 5475-68Published

Petitioner, an attorney, incurred legal and related expenses incident to his contest of his father's will which had disinherited him and which contained statements expressing the decedent's wish that the petitioner not take over decedent's law practice, but that another attorney take over the pending legal matters.

Read the full summary

Petitioner, an attorney, incurred legal and related expenses incident to his contest of his father's will which had disinherited him and which contained statements expressing the decedent's wish that the petitioner not take over decedent's law practice, but that another attorney take over the pending legal matters. Held, that petitioner has not shown that such expenses constituted ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in carrying on his business as an attorney under sec. 162(a), I.R.C. 1954. Held, further, that such expenses do not constitute ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in the…

1Opinion of the Court

Robert Perret, Jr., Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Perret v. Commissioner

Docket No. 5475-68

United States Tax Court

55 T.C. 712; 1971 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 194;

February 1, 1971, Filed

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Petitioner, an attorney, incurred legal and related expenses incident to his contest of his father's will which had disinherited him and which contained statements expressing the decedent's wish that the petitioner not take over decedent's law practice, but that another attorney take over the pending legal matters. Held, that petitioner has not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Corley v. . McElmeelNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Waxson Realty Corp. v. RothschildNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Merriman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API