Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Hirsch

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 30, 1978No. 51577, 50149PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

359 So.2d 856 (1978)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

David N. HIRSCH, Respondent.

Nos. 51577, 50149.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 30, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 20, 1978.

Stanley B. Powell, Bar Counsel, and David G. McGunegle, Asst. Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, for complainant.

David N. Hirsch, in pro per.

2Per curiam

Referees of The Florida Bar, in each of these consolidated cases, have found that David N. Hirsch, a member of The Florida Bar, has engaged in professional misconduct. The Bar's Complaints charged (1) that Hirsch failed to diligently prosecute a client's lawsuit although repeatedly requested by…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. WagnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  2. The Florida Bar v. HirschSupreme Court of Florida · 1977

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. VannierSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. The Florida Bar v. HooperSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Florida Bar v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. The Florida Bar v. McClureSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. The Florida Bar v. PriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API