Legal Opinion

Consolidated Pipe Co. v. Wolski

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1931No. Docket No. Sac. 4337PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a lien for materials alleged to have been sold to the defendants and used by them in the sinking of a well. Defendant Dionne did not appear. Defendant Wolski, owner of the land, interposed an answer in which he denied the allegations of the complaint and set up certain special defenses. At the outset of the trial, it was stipulated that all the allegations of the complaint were true, except the allegations charging the defendant [Wolski] with personal liability for the amount of the claim. The trial court found dll. the allegations of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ogden v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peccole v. Luce & Goodfellow, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Wand Corp. v. San Gabriel Valley Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Burton v. SosinskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Shafer v. Los Serranos Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Lyon v. LyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API