Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Sherwin-Williams Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 7, 1906No. Gen. No. 12,452PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Forcible detainer proceeding. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1905.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ball

This was a forcible detainer brought December 5, 1904, by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error. Issue was joined, and upon trial at the close of all the evi. deuce, the jury, under the instructions of the court, returned a verdict finding the plaintiffs in error guilty of unlawfully withholding possession of said premises from the defendant in error. Judgment for possession and an order for writ of restitution and execution for costs were entered against plaintiffs in error. ' This writ of error followed.

The complaint described the premises as “two fishing shanties situated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scheffel v. WeilerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  2. Peters v. LakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Ballance v. FortierIllinois Supreme Court · 1846
  4. Coppinger v. ArmstrongAppellate Court of Illinois · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. BellroseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  2. Spoor v. MeyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  3. Foster v. RudisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  4. Willoughby v. Security Trust & Deposit Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API