Lee v. State

BOTJLDIN, Justice.

We do not construe the opinion of the Court of Appeals to hold there was error in admitting the confession of defendant Ayers, •being tried jointly with this appellant by consent, as evidence against Ayers, with instructions to the jury not to consider such confession as evidence against appellant, Lee.

The discussion along this line appears to be by way of accounting for a verdict against Lee upon “very slight evidence” other than Ayers’ confession; and the denial of the motion for new trial held error because, in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, the verdict •against Lee…