Legal Opinion

Balcorta v. 20th Century Fox Film Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided July 16, 1998No. CV 98-2653 RAP (MANx)Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT AND AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES

PAEZ, District Judge.

I

Introduction

This is an action for statutory waiting time penalties brought by an electrical rigger employed by defendant Twentieth *1197Century Fox Film Corporation ( Fox”) under Cal.Lab.Code § 203. Having removed the case on two separate occasions, see Order Remanding Case to California Labor Commissioner, CB 98-1814 RAP (MANx) filed concurrently, defendant seeks summary judgment based on its contention that plaintiffs claim is preempted by § 301 of the Labor…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API