Balcorta v. 20th Century Fox Film Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT AND AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES
PAEZ, District Judge.
I
Introduction
This is an action for statutory waiting time penalties brought by an electrical rigger employed by defendant Twentieth *1197Century Fox Film Corporation ( Fox”) under Cal.Lab.Code § 203. Having removed the case on two separate occasions, see Order Remanding Case to California Labor Commissioner, CB 98-1814 RAP (MANx) filed concurrently, defendant seeks summary judgment based on its contention that plaintiffs claim is preempted by § 301 of the Labor…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.