Schenectady Chemicals, Inc. v. De Luke Sand & Gravel Co.
New York County Courts
1Opinion of the CourtArchibald C. Wemple, J.
The problem herein arises out of a proceeding in eminent domain commenced by the Boston, Hoosac Tunnel & Western Railway Company by a petition dated May 2,1883 to acquire certain parcels of land (including the property' in suit) pursuant to 1 ‘ An Act to authorize the formation of railroad corporations, and to regulate the same passed April 2, 1850 and the several acts amendatory thereof and supplemental thereto The title in the proceedings brought in Supreme Court, Saratoga County recites ‘1 to acquire title to lands of Jacob Mabee Fortunately the original petition and proceedings thereon…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Snell v. . LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Proprietors of Locks & Canals on Merrimack River v. Nashua & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Thompson v. Orange & Rockland Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Heard v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Strong v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schenectady Chemicals, Inc. v. De Luke Sand & Gravel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968