Legal Opinion · Dissent

Windham Bank v. Tomaszczyk

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1971No. 69-780Published

1DissentStern, J.

In our judicial system, it is within the inherent power of the court to protect its processes against wrongdoing and to punish, as and for contempt, those who may commit such unlawful conduct.

Misconduct in law does not, per se, constitute contempt of court. Unlawful conduct, in violation of rights of ownership, does not constitute contempt unless the unlawful conduct consists of doing something which is pro*60hibited, or in failing to do something which is required, by the terms of a court order. 17 American Jurisprudence 2d 18, Section 13.

A recitation of the pertinent facts in this case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Turner v. AlbinOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Ex Parte: BostwickSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API