State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, J.
Willie Smith appeals his conviction of violating the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, arguing that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of awards and commendations a police officer received, and that the prosecutor should not have been allowed to ask Smith whether the police witnesses were lying. We affirm.
Facts
On December 11, 1989, Seattle Police Officer Victor Maes watched an area near Pike Place Market with binoculars in an undercover narcotics operation. He saw Smith conversing with a woman on the street. The woman removed a small white object from her mouth and placed it in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. RobtoyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. DennisonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BoastWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. Suarez-BravoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- State v. PadillaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.