Legal Opinion
Garza v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1983No. 83-152PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C.J.
The appellant, Pedro Garza, appeals from an order entered by the District Court for Douglas County, Nebraska, affirming the action of the Board of Trustees of the City of Omaha Employees’ Retirement System (Board of Trustees) in denying to Garza a monthly disability pension sought by Garza pursuant to § 22-35 of the Omaha Municipal Code (1980). On review we believe that the trial court was correct and the judgment should be affirmed.
Garza was employed by the City of Omaha since 1975. In 1976 he was promoted to the position of automotive equipment operator (AEO-I), and was employed by the city…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- County of Douglas v. Board of Regents of University of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. HamiltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. One 1970 2-Door Sedan Rambler (Gremlin)Nebraska Supreme Court · 1974
- Caniglia v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Lynch v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coffelt v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
- Brunken v. Board of Trustees of Omaha Police & Fire Retirement SystemNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Brunken v. City of Omaha Employees' Retirement System Board of TrusteesNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Bluff's Vision Clinic, P.C. v. KrzyzanowskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Bluff's Vision Clinic, P.C. v. KrzyzanowskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.