State v. Allen
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.
A defendant in a criminal proceeding may invoke the doctrine of collateral estoppel to preclude the State from trying an ultimate fact found in favor of the defendant at a prior trial. Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 445, 90 S.Ct. 1189, 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970). This defensive use of collateral estoppel derives from the protection provided a criminal defendant under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Id. We are asked in the case at bar to consider whether collateral estoppel may be applied against a criminal defendant to foreclose the jury from finding for itself all of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Wolfe, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- State v. HewinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- State v. HuffineMontana Supreme Court · 2018
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Wolfe, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016