Legal Opinion

Romero v. Morrisania Towers Housing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 17, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell on a “brownish liquid” in the stairwell of a building owned and managed by the Morrisania defendants, cleaned by the FQM defendants, and monitored by McRoberts. Defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that they did not have notice of the hazardous *508condition. Indeed, they did not submit evidence, based on personal knowledge, of their fulfillment of their cleaning and inspection duties at the subject premises on the date in question. Accordingly, the burden did not shift to plaintiff regarding notice (see e.g. De La Cruz v Lettera Sign & Elec. Co.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. De La Cruz v. Lettera Sign & Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maria v. Concourse Estate, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Maria v. Concourse Estate, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. Diaz-Pascall v. PereiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. Scafe v. Schindler Elevator Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Scafe v. Schindler Elevator Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API