Legal Opinion

State v. Kanakaris

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1917No. 4,012PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Yellowstone County; Geo. W. Pierson, Judge. Gust Kanakaris was convicted of a violation of certain provisions of Chapter 1, Laws of 1911, and from the judgment and order denying his motion for new trial he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

The defendant was prosecuted for a violation of certain provisions of Chapter 1, Laws of 1911, was convicted, sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than fifteen years, nor more than twenty years, and has appealed from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

1. The charging part of the information follows: “That the said Gust Kanakaris, then and there being, then and there, a male person, willfully, wrongfully, unlawfully and feloniously did live with and in whole and in part upon the earnings'of, and money supplied by one Ollie Nunley, she, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State v. MahoneyMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State v. PennaMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State v. De WolfeMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State v. RogersMontana Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. PassamaMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ShannonMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State v. PippiMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State v. SearleMontana Supreme Court · 1952
  5. State v. MarchindoMontana Supreme Court · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API