Legal Opinion

Thornber v. Ballard

Fairfax County Circuit Court

Decided February 28, 1992No. Case No. (Law) 105009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Michael P. McWeeny

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the defendant’s defense as a result of the defendant invoking the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to certain interrogatories. As set forth more fully below, the Motion is granted.

In the Motion for Judgment, plaintiff alleges that the defendant, while acting as his attorney, committed malpractice and breached a fiduciary duty. Specifically, of $70,000 which plaintiff entrusted to the defendant’s care, $37,957 has been lost through defendant’s negligence, error and omissions. In his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North American Mortgage Investors v. PomponioSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
  2. United Supermarkets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  4. Jewell v. Ferrell & AssociatesFairfax County Circuit Court · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Xinic v. QuickFairfax County Circuit Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API