Legal Opinion
Department of Transportation v. Kendricks
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 7, 1978No. 56542PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Judge.
The Department of Transportation ("DOT”) appeals the jury verdict and judgment based upon a claimed excess in a condemnation award. The appellees are the property owner and a leaseholder as intervenor. The facts show that in 1973, DOT obtained an easement on a narrow strip of land facing on Highway 301 running from south to north through the City of Jesup. The property owner was Ms. Kendricks and the intervenor, Clanton Motor Co., which rented the property from Ms. Kendricks. Prior to the taking in 1973, Clanton operated three separate businesses on the property, a Dodge…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bowers v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Argonaut Insurance v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Department of Transportation v. DentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- HOUSING &C. CITY OF ATLANTA v. TroncalliCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- State Highway Department v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Moses v. Diocese of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Department of Transportation v. Dixie Highway Bottle Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Department of Transportation v. 2.734 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Department of Transportation v. LewynCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Department of Transportation v. Consolidated Equities Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.