Legal Opinion

City of Manassa v. Ruff

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 21, 2010No. 09SC612Published

1Opinion of the Court

235 P.3d 1051 (2010)

CITY OF MANASSA and Pinnacol Assurance, Petitioners/Cross-Respondents

v.

Dale RUFF, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner and

Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colorado, Respondent.

No. 09SC612.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

June 21, 2010.

Francis A. Koncilja, Koncilja & Associates, P.C., Denver, Colorado, Steven U. Mullens, Steven U. Mullens, P.C., Colorado Springs, Colorado, Attorneys for Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.

William J. Macdonald, Denver, Colorado, Attorney for Amicus Curiae the WCEA.

Harvey D. Flewelling, Pinnacol Assurance, Denver, Colorado, Attorney for…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API