Legal Opinion

Erdman v. United States

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 7, 1985No. C-2-83-1170PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KINNEARY, District Judge.

This is a taxpayer’s action wherein the plaintiffs, Charles and Ruth Erdman, seek a tax refund to recover $25,484 for the 1976 tax year. Jurisdiction in this present action is based upon 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1). The defendant, the United States, moves to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

In October, 1977 the plaintiffs filed a refund claim for the entire amount of the tax paid for the year 1976 based on the deductibility of a loss which had not been claimed on the original return. Thereafter, the Internal Revenue Service…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Smale & Robinson, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
  4. Ned Miller and Frances Miller v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. Tonkonogy v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Charles J. Erdman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API