Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 12, 1931No. A-7947Published

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted of having possession of a still and worm, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50, and be imprisoned in the county jail for 30 days. Prom the judgment, the defendant has appealed.

Considerable record is made in this case on the question of the validity of a search warrant. From an exami-' nation of the testimony contained in the record, the testimony of the state shows that the officers had searched certain places, and when they came to defendant’s house and talked with him with reference to the information they had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Tennison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Harvey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API