Legal Opinion

Conners v. Poticha

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 30, 1997No. 1-96-3546PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cousins

Plaintiff, Patricia Conners, filed a complaint against defendant, Dr. Stuart Poticha, for the inadequate treatment of plaintiff’s recurring infection subsequent to a hernia operation performed by defendant. The jury rendered a verdict in defendant’s favor, and plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial asserting error in the admission of certain testimony offered by defendant and one of his expert witnesses. The trial court denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court committed reversible error: (1) by allowing defendant to offer a new opinion…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Leonardi v. Loyola University of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. GacyIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Holston v. Sisters of Third Order of St. FrancisIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Baird v. AdeliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Copeland v. Stebco Products Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. Becht v. PalacAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. Scassifero v. GlaserAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Hawn v. FritcherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Arreguin-Leon v. Hadco ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API