Legal Opinion
Cochrane v. McGinnis
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 4, 2002No. Docket No. 01-2557PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.
Brendan Cochrane appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Weinstein, J.) denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Following a jury trial in New York Supreme Court, Kings County, Cochrane was convicted of attempted murder, assault, and criminal possession of a weapon. He seeks the federal writ on the ground that the state trial court’s exclusion from evidence of an allegedly exculpatory…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. ElyNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. CochraneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Cochrane v. McGinnisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- Paulus v. Holimont, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2015
- Cochrane v. McGinnis Superintendent, Downstate Correctional FacilitySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Harris v. Great MeadowDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020