Legal Opinion

Mace v. Cole

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCiirtstianson, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the alleged conversion of certain grain upon which plaintiff claims he had a threshing lien. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings and conclusions in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment was entered accordingly, and defendant has appealed.

The material facts in the case are substantially as follows:

Some time prior to 1920 the defendant, S. T. Cole, sold a certain tract of land in Ransom county in this state to one W. E. Chisman, upon the “crop payment plan.” In the fall of 1920 said Chisman rented said tract of land to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grossman v. . SchenkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Wojahn v. National Union Bank of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. McDonough v. Russell-Miller Milling Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Merchants' State Bank v. Sawyer Farmers' Co-operative Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Mitchell v. Monarch Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. DannerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Norwest Bank-Jamestown v. Ostlund Chemical Co. (In Re Glinz)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1984
  3. Elmore Jameson Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Blank v. FentonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Christensen v. GuthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API