Legal Opinion

Moraga v. Wolfson

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided March 9, 2020No. 2:16-cv-00287Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 ROY D. MORAGA, Case No. 2:16-CV-287 JCM (VCF) 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v. 10 STEVE WOLFSON, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 Presently before the court is pro se plaintiff Roy Moraga’s motion for entry of clerk’s 14 default and default judgment. (ECF No. 17). 15 Also before the court is Moraga’s motion for “failure to comply with Ninth Circuit court 16 order.” (ECF No. 21). Defendants Steve Wolfson and Linda Errichetto did not file a response, 17 and the time for doing so has passed. 18 I. Background 19 On February 11, 2016,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Carroll v. NakataniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Durkin v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1977
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API