Legal Opinion

Mauldin v. Lexington Roller Mills Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 2, 1942No. 14324PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

1. “A demurrer to an original petition does not, without more, cover the petition after it has been amended in material respects; but in such case the demurrer should be renewed if it is still relied on.” Livingston v. Barnett, 193 Ga. 640 (19 S. E. 2d, 385).

2. “An amendment to a petition adding a new cause of action should not be allowed, and if improvidently allowed may be stricken on motion; but if such an amendment has been regularly allowed and filed, and the petition as amended sets forth a cause of action, the same should not be dismissed on motion on the ground that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Livingston v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Bell v. Dawson Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Aycock v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Dyson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. McBride v. GibbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ware v. RankinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  2. Mooney v. MooneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Hardy v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Whitehurst v. Del-Cook Timber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API