Mauldin v. Lexington Roller Mills Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
1. “A demurrer to an original petition does not, without more, cover the petition after it has been amended in material respects; but in such case the demurrer should be renewed if it is still relied on.” Livingston v. Barnett, 193 Ga. 640 (19 S. E. 2d, 385).
2. “An amendment to a petition adding a new cause of action should not be allowed, and if improvidently allowed may be stricken on motion; but if such an amendment has been regularly allowed and filed, and the petition as amended sets forth a cause of action, the same should not be dismissed on motion on the ground that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Livingston v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Bell v. Dawson Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Aycock v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Dyson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- McBride v. GibbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ware v. RankinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Mooney v. MooneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Hardy v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Whitehurst v. Del-Cook Timber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1959