Jones v. City of Boston
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KAYATTA, Circuit Judge.
Making their second appearance before this court are eight police officers, a police cadet, and a provisionally hired 911 operator (collectively, the “Officers”), who claim that they suffered adverse employment actions by the Boston Police Department (“Department”) as a result of a racially discriminatory hair drug test. Eschewing any claim that the Department discriminated against them intentionally, the Officers advance a so-called disparate impact claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(k). Adjudicating the question of liability…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Zingg v. GroblewskiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Cara Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Smith v. City of BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- J. Walter Thompson P.R. Inc. v. Latin Am. Music Co.United States District Court · 2018
- Alston v. Town of BrooklineDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.