Legal Opinion

Jones v. City of Boston

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 28, 2016No. 15-2015PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge.

Making their second appearance before this court are eight police officers, a police cadet, and a provisionally hired 911 operator (collectively, the “Officers”), who claim that they suffered adverse employment actions by the Boston Police Department (“Department”) as a result of a racially discriminatory hair drug test. Eschewing any claim that the Department discriminated against them intentionally, the Officers advance a so-called disparate impact claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(k). Adjudicating the question of liability…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Zingg v. GroblewskiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  2. Cara Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  3. Smith v. City of BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  4. J. Walter Thompson P.R. Inc. v. Latin Am. Music Co.United States District Court · 2018
  5. Alston v. Town of BrooklineDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API