Legal Opinion
Goldsticker v. Ford
Texas Supreme Court
Decided November 14, 1884No. Case No. 1637PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Appeal from Milam. Tried below before the Hon. W. E. Collard.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
This action was brought by the county attorney for Milam county, in the name of P. S. Ford, its. county judge, for the use and benefit of the county, to recover the-sum of $500 from H. Goldsticker, and A. A. Burke and John H. Redding, his sureties, on a bond given by him as a retail liquor-dealer under the provisions of the act of April 4, 1881 (General Laws, 113).
A copy of the bond of Goldsticker and his sureties was made a part of the petition, and as a breach thereof it was alleged that “ Gold-sticker did knowingly permit one Jay Childress, a minor under the age…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Bush v. Republic of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1846
- State v. ClottuIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chapa v. Club Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- State v. . AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Debenham v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Douthit v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- McGuire v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.