Eppsteiner v. Isman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 380, Jan. T., 1912, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1911, No. 5212, In Equity, dismissing bill in case of Leo Eppsteiner v. Felix Isman, Incorporated. Bill in equity to rescind contract for sale of real estate. Before Audenried, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of "the Supreme Court. The court made a decree dismissing the hill. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was the decree of the court dismissing the bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This appeal is from a decree dismissing a bill to rescind a contract for the sale of real estate by the defendant to the plaintiff and to require a return of the consideration to him on his making a reconveyance.
The relief sought by the bill was based upon the allegation that fraudulent representations of fact were made by the defendant’s agent in the course of the negotiations which led to the sale. The learned trial judge, on a careful review of the testimony, found that the representations alleged to have been made were not in fact made. This finding is conclusive of the…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Gongaware's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Sullivan v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Cruzan v. CruzanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Ben Avon Borough v. Ohio Valley Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- HANKIN v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.