Legal Opinion

Perez v. Barge LBT 4

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 19, 1969No. 27641PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804.

The District Judge, sitting in admiralty, awarded Manuel Perez and Arthur Couture judgments aggregating *408$1,450 for the salvage of Barge LBT #4. This included loss of pay, rental of a skiff, and damage to a boat used in the salvage operations. LeBeouf Brothers Barge Company appeals…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. The BlackwallSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. W. E. Rippon & Son, as Owner of the Sheerlegs Pluto, Libelant-Appellee v. United States of America, as Owner of the U.S.N.S. OcklawahaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  4. Beach Salvage Corp. of Florida v. the Shrimp Boats Cap't. TomDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1961
  5. Dize v. Steel Barge BeverlyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perez v. Barge LbtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API