Legal Opinion
Kent v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 7, 1945No. 46037Published
1Opinion of the Court
60 F.Supp. 203 (1945)
KENT
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 46037.
Court of Claims.
May 7, 1945.
James O. Wynn, of New York City (Robert N. Montgomery and J. Marvin Haynes, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiff.
Elizabeth B. Davis, of Washington, D. C., and Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Louis Monarch and Fred K. Dyar, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for defendant.
Before WHALEY, Chief Justice, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, JONES, and MADDEN, Judges.
MADDEN, Judge. Delivered the opinion of the court:
The plaintiff claims that he was required to pay $113,938.02 more than he owed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Kent v. RothensiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Engineer's Club of Philadelphia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
- Kent v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945