Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Roper Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 8, 1988No. 87-3239PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE CAMPBELL

delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal is predicated upon an umbrella excess third-party liability policy (the policy) issued by plaintiff-counterdefendant, Continental Casualty Company, to defendant-counterplaintiff, Roper Corporation. Roper appeals from three orders entered by the trial court: (1) the April 23, 1987, order holding that coverage A of the policy, not coverage B, applied to the claims at issue; (2) the June 23, 1987, order allowing Continental to file its affirmative defense in response to Roper’s second amended counterclaim; and (3) the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Osgood v. SkinnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Donald B. MacNeal, Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Joanna Garmany, by and Through Her Next Friends v. Mission Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Gorham v. FarsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Needy v. SparksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Benedict v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. Country Mutual Insurance Co. v. Teachers Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Schwinn Cycling & Fitness, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  4. Benedict v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Roberts v. Northland InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API